top of page

Review: Rethinking Medications

  • Apr 22, 2025
  • 1 min read

A masterful assessment of a highly flawed health care system.

Unsettling news about prescription drugs.


Avorn, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, reminds readers that pharmaceutical companies, despite bitter opposition, were required to prove that their drugs worked beginning only in 1962. Ironically, their first mass support came from radicals when 1980s AIDS activists denounced the neglect and slow pace of anti-AIDS drug approval. Responding, the FDA created an Accelerated Approval program to release drugs quickly based on “surrogate” clinical endpoints. For example: If, early in research, an anti-diabetic drug lowers blood sugar, that’s a hopeful surrogate sign, and it may be approved. But lowering blood sugar does nothing to prevent heart disease, blindness, infections, and other diseases that afflict diabetics. Sensibly, the FDA insists that research proceed, but drug companies avoid this. A drug proven effective does not increase profits because it’s already approved, and failure is disaster.

Recent Posts

See All
Review: Rethinking Medications

From Publishers Weekly A damning survey of the drug development system’s many failures, this enlightens even as it infuriates. In this troubling report, Avorn (Powerful Medicines), a professor of medi

 
 
Review: Powerful Medicines

From Kirkus Reviews Marked by solid scholarship, measured criticism, and pithy comments: an informative and highly readable study Cogent analysis of how pharmaceutical drugs are approved, promoted, an

 
 
bottom of page